Scenes at Sand Creek
Captain John McCannon at the Sand Creek Massacre
©2005 KcLonewolf.com  All Rights Reserved
This site may be freely linked to but not duplicated or copied in any fashion without permission.
We'll never forget
"Scenes at Sand Creek" - A Rocky Mountain News interview of Captain John McCannon in 1881, detailing his experiences
and opinions regarding the Sand Creek Massacre.

Rocky Mountain News, January 26, 1881


The Cheyenne Massacre Casually Reviewed.

Captain McCannon Fights It All Over Again.

From the Bivouac at Bijou to the Deadly Rifle Pits.

Jealousy the Cause of Chivington's Disgrace.

The presence in the city of Captain John McCannon, who came to Colorado in 1859, recalls the circumstances
of the great Sand Creek massacre of November, 1864.

The immediate causes leading to the consummation of that memorable event are but vaguely understood in this
day of progress and civilization, when an Indian fight hundreds of miles from Denver would attract great
attention, to say nothing of such an engagement within a few miles.  The history of the Sand Creek massacre,
which will live when the men who participated in it have passed away and their children have grown old, was the
culmination of a long continued series of Indian outrages perpetrated upon the pioneer settlers and upon the
emigrants crossing the plains between 1860 and 1861. These Indians were a band of Cheyennes of about one
thousand in number, and the diabolical character of their depredations will never be forgotten by any one who
witnessed any of the results attendant.  There were times - and not infrequently either - when an attempt to run
the gauntlet of these savages across the untraveled (sic) plain was as much as a life was worth and the stories
of the savages butcheries were horrible and well calculated to arouse the ire of the people on either side of the
great desert.

The stages, which in those days furnished the only rapid mode of conveyance, were repeatedly attacked and
plundered and the hapless passengers put to the torture before being finally despatched (sic). Trains of
emigrants en route to the newly discovered gold fields were attacked and plundered in the same way, until in the
course of time the matter became past forbearance. Several freight trains had been stopped, the drivers
butchered, and the wagons plundered and subsequently burnt.  The result was that freights were cut off and at
times the people, who then so scantily populated this region, were threatened with famine.

But the last straw which broke the camel's back and exhausted the forbearance of the hardy pioneers was the
notorious butchery of the Hungate family, on Running creek, some miles east of Denver.  The mutilated bodies
were brought into this city and so revolting was their appearance that those who looked upon them forgot not the
sight then, nor will they ever. The family consisted of several persons, among them two children, and their bodies
were virtually chopped into pieces and left at the ranch to fester in the sun.

This horrible atrocity so roused the people that immediate action was decided upon. Hon. John Evans, who was
then governor of Colorado-territory, sent to the national capital for troops with which to protect the frontier from
these savages - but there were no troops at hand and hence the scheme failed.  But authority was given
Governor Evans to raise a regiment of cavalry, and, with the express purpose of avenging the atrocities of the
past, men enrolled rapidly into the new ranks.  In six weeks time the regiment was full.

About the first of October, 1864, the regiment started from Denver, headed toward Bijou basin, en route to the
scene of action, and remained there for a short time, awaiting accoutrements, after which the line of march was
taken up for Fort Lyon.

"We stopped at Fort Lyon only long enough to get supper," said Captain McCannon, "and then we made a
forced march that night for the Indian camp at Sand creek, about 45 miles away.  It was a hard march, and it was
highly necessary that we reach the evening's camp before daybreak.  Well, we made it.  From the peculiar
position of the camp we saw it before coming upon it. All were wrapped in a deep sleep.  The ponies were quietly
grazing on the hill sides, and took but little notice of us.  We moved along as quietly and rapidly as we could, and
when we got at the proper distance, the hushed order to "charge" was given.  Every man in the line fell to with a
will, and before we knew what we were about we were engaged in a terrible and deadly struggle.  The Indians
had been surprised, it is true, but were nevertheless defending and attacking with the greatest fury and

They opened the fight.  The first man killed was killed by them - his name was Rice or Price.  After the onslaught
the Indians ran to their rifle pits and began firing in on us with great rapidity.  The arrows flew lively, let me tell
you, and the air was just filled with them - they looked just like little blue streaks.  But the rifle pits did not hold
them long, for our boys rode them down before they knew were (sic) they were. Then the fight changed.

"From a regular charge and attack the business got down to a single-handed style and then it was man for man.

"The battle waged all day until nearly four o'clock in the afternoon, when the earth for a mile and a half was
covered with dead bodies of slain Indians.  Then some of the survivors contrived to get to their ponies - we had
cut them off before - and made off with the rapidity of the wind.

"That was the great battle of Sand creek.  Colonel Chivington was brigade commander and Colonel Shoup had
command of the regiment."

"How many Indians were killed, captain?"

"Well, I think there were between 600 and 700."

"Did the fight end there?"

"After the remaining Indians had cut out, Colonel Chivington recalled the command into camp to prepare to follow
the fugitives, but it was not done.  It was nearly night when the battle ended and we couldn't very well do
anything more then."

(It will be seen that the soldiers had had neither sleep nor food since the previous day.)

"You remember, captain, that Chivington was always greatly blamed for that action?"

"Yes, but there was a very good reason why.  You see Shoup's appointment as colonel of the Third regiment
caused great jealousy.

"Shoup had only been second lieutenant of the First and his being jumped to a colonelcy (sic) all at once made
the boys mad.  Governor Evans had to appoint somebody before a regiment could be formed, and Shoup had
been south after guerrillas with great success, and the recruits came voluntarily.  The whole matter of
Chivington's blame may be attributed to Sam Tappan and Ed. Wynkoop, whose jealousy caused it.  After the war
General Sherman came to Denver and Sam was with him.  They talked about an investigation, but the feeling
was too hot and Sam had to hide himself.  Why, sir, they would have taken him out and lynched him at sight."



McCannon commanded Company I, Colorado Third Volunteer Cavalry.

Read more about the Hungate family, massacred by Indians in June 1864.

McCannon says, "We stopped at Fort Lyon only long enough to get supper."  No mention is made, however, regarding the heated
arguments that ensued all day at Fort Lyon, regarding First Regiment officers’ objection to attacking the Indian prisoners at Sand

McCannon refers to the first man killed, identifying him as “Rice” or “Price.”  The soldier was actually Private George W. Pierce,
attached to Company F, Colorado First Cavalry, commanded by Lieutenant Joseph Cramer.  McCannon makes obvious reference
to Pierce, insisting the Indians killed him, due to accusations made at the time of the massacre alleging that Pierce was killed by
friendly fire.  Some members of the First Cavalry reported that Pierce, during the initial attack, spotted Indian Interpreter John Smith
waving a white kerchief and running toward the soldiers.  Pierce reportedly rode out to save Smith, but his horse stumbled and
fell.  When he tried to remount, he was killed.  Pierce was obviously caught in a crossfire, but many Sand Creek critics insisted he
was killed by Third Regiment soldiers angered at his attempt to save Smith, whom many considered to be an Indian sympathizer
(Smith’s son, Jack, was half Cheyenne.)

McCannon reiterates his opinion on the controversial topic of rifle pits.  Chivington and his supporters insisted the Indians dug the
pits ahead of time in obvious anticipation of an attack.  Sand Creek critics claim no such pits existed, and the Indians burrowed in
only after the attack commenced.

After 17 years, McCannon still insisted that 600 to 700 Indians were killed.  The official count made two weeks after the fight put the
number around 160 to 170.  The Rocky Mountain News interviewer does not ask McCannon about the number of women and
children killed.

McCannon points to jealousy over George L. Shoup’s promotion from Lieutenant to Colonel as the primary reason for the
controversy regarding Chivington’s attack at Sand Creek.  He further accuses Lt. Col. Sam Tappan and Major Edward Wynkoop as
the primary detractors.  Chivington did recommend Shoup for the promotion, some say because of Shoup’s political support of
Chivington and Governor Evans.  Shoup’s promotion was indeed unusual, and there was undoubtedly jealousy among officers
with and without political motivation.  The controversy over Sand Creek, however, ran much deeper, as many officers and soldiers
present at the attack based their criticism on both the impropriety of attacking Indian prisoners, and the barbarous scalping and
mutilation of the dead following the attack.

In addition to Tappan and Wynkoop, other "high officials" rumored to be involved in the push for an investigation of Chivington were
State Attorney S. E. Browne and Colorado Chief Justice Benjamin Hall.


Hoig Stan, The Sand Creek Massacre

Roberts, Gary L.  Sand Creek: Tragedy and Symbol

Go to
bibliography for citation.

Sand Creek also
available at
Home    |    Sand Creek Massacre    |    Sand Creek Timeline     |   Sand Creek Bibliography    |    Sand Creek Documents     |   Sand Creek Links   |   Contact  
PRIVACY - kclonewolf.com gathers only general site navigation statistics, and does not monitor personal information of site visitors.  All correspondence sent to this
site is private, and e-mail addresses are not sold to spammers. Spam sent to this site is automatically deleted, unopened.
Related Articles:

Rocky Mountain News Editorials After the Sand Creek Massacre, including:
The Battle of Sand Creek – praises the Colorado third regiment. December 17, 1864.
The Third – 3rd Regiment soldiers not paid for their service at Sand Creek.  December 29, 1864.
The Fort Lyon Affair – Indignation over criticism of the Sand Creek attack.  December 30, 1864.
Its Effect – The consequences of a congressional investigation.  December 31, 1864.

Arrival of the Third Regiment - Grand March Through Town - Details Third Regiment return to Denver after the Sand Creek
Massacre.  Rocky Mountain News, December 22, 1864.

High Officials Checkmated – Letter to editor criticizes “High Officials” rumored to be pushing for an investigation into the Sand
Creek Massacre.   Rocky Mountain News, January 4, 1865.

Rocky Mountain News archives available at the Denver Public Library Western History Dept.
Two Articles:
Appeal to the People, authorizing the organization of civilian militias, under the rules of militia law, to fight hostile Indian bands;
Rocky Mountain News, August 10, 1864.
Proclamation – After receiving approval from the War Department, Governor Evans calls for volunteers to join the Colorado Third
Regiment to fight Indians for a period of 100 days; Rocky Mountain News, August 13, 1864.

To Fight Indians – Rocky Mountain News editorial urges Colorado citizens to form militias at the request of Governor Evans; to
organize under the rules of militia law, and fight hostile Indian bands, Rocky Mountain News, August 10, 1864.

The Reynolds Band – Editorial defends the killing of five members of the notorious James Reynolds Gang by Colorado soldiers;
Rocky Mountain News, September 9, 1864.